America appears to be at its weakest condition both nationally and internationally (if the two can be considered separately), if not ever, certainly since the Civil War. Weâre entering the last few months of the most questionable Presidency in our history, during which the actual levers of power and communication seem to be in the hands of unknown people other than the erstwhile president, Joe Biden. Major changes in our international relationships have taken place in the same period, including significant failures both military and diplomatic. Our greatest enemies have formed new or stronger alliances against the U. S. or its allies, and our economic position is under daily assault, also both domestically and internationally.
Our financial structure is groaning under the weight of excessive borrowing and debt. Even as the cost of INTEREST in the federal budget has exceeded One Trillion Dollars per year, the Biden-Harris regime is planning deficit spending that will take our total debt to over $50 Trillion in another 10 to 15 years! Even without the Marxist welfare plans they have, deficit spending is now such a habit in federal budgeting that the concept of balance income and expenses at the federal level is so politically distant that the risks to solvency AND OUR ABILITY TO DEFEND OURSELVES, are far away behind a fog-bank of self-service and electoral enrichment.
Our Navy, for example, is at its smallest, least-modernized status of the past 50 years. Our latest aircraft are so expensive that fleet size has been curtailed, as are, sadly, some of the advanced technologies, themselves. Piece by piece, we have reduced the number of defense contractors, and thus the competitive pressures that yield the best innovations and quality. Many armaments depend on materials and chips, in particular, that must be imported. It is questionable whether the U. S. could sustain more than a week or two of all-out war with either Russia or China. Indeed, we are strained to provide arms to Ukraine and Israel at the same time.
And our allies, solid and ephemeral? The Biden regime has disturbed them at every turn. The inexplicable retreat from Afghanistan, after pouring treasure and people into that odd, horribly expensive balancing act of inexplicable purpose, has other nations wondering about trusting the U. S. when the chips are down for their countries. Why didnât we hold Baghram Air Force Base? Because the Chinese Communists told Biden they wanted us out of there? They didnât want the U. S. able to strike from a few hundred miles instead of several thousand? What should India think⌠or Pakistan? Or, anyone else?
Weâre no longer the âarsenal of DemocracyâŚâ more like the arse-holes of Democracy. Weâve been sending our treasure and our best young people to other lands to instill a form of government and ostensible freedom, that we donât want, ourselves! Indeed, one of our major political parties delights in encouraging demonstrations and riots that tear at the roots of our society as if they prove how wonderful and âfreeâ our system is. It is, apparently, a message that 70 MILLION aborted Americans canât transmit.
A majority of Americans no longer trust our basic institutions of government and society, including even medicine and higher education. One political party constantly tells us how crass and dismal our history is, how the high-falutin ideals of our founding are really lies told by enslavers, how religion is part of the lies we have been told, and how children can be helped to change their genders. It is difficult for citizens to keep their mental footing.
Marriage is crumbling. There is no more significant pillar upholding Western / American civilization than strong, committed, life-long marriages. Those on the left, opposed to religion, particularly Christianity â and the farther Left the more virulently opposed â look to government laws and regulations as the only source of ethics or, even, morals. Satisfying government bureaucrats, so-called âexperts,â is the goal of anti-religionists. Satisfying personal, conscientious beliefs and oaths of honor, is the abiding guideline of those raised in a religious environment, in families strengthened by the same sort of personal honor. There is nothing stronger or more life-affirming. No civilization or culture can survive or grow without a commitment to LIFE. The growing commitment to anti-life, anti-marriage and anti-growth in America, is a recipe for doom. We are reinforcing this trend with our mendacious economics, as well.
The left, placing its entire hopefulness in the hands of government, cannot trust in individuals or their ethics. The private economy is a mystery to leftists / socialists / Communists and Democrat liberals. They call themselves âprogressivesâ so as to avoid anyone mouthing those other names. They believe that welfare and massive government spending will somehow make individuals smarter, stronger, more productive and more moral. Having rejected spiritual life, entirely, Progressives place no trust in any individualâs motivation to do what is right or beneficial. Consequently, Progressive, far-left Presidential administrations will, and always have, diverted resources away from Defense and into domestic âfree stuff.â
On Mayday, 2010, a major water main bringing water from the Quabbin Reservoir in Massachusetts to the Greater Boston city and regional system, burst at a gigantic valve in the town of Weston. It created a major water emergency. Governor Deval Patrick issued directives for people to boil their water until further notice. Made eminent sense. At the same time, the MWRA brought truckloads of bottled water to key distribution points. One might think that boiling water would be a function that most humans in the United States could handle⌠even in 2010. Fights broke out over the bottled water distribution, fights that made the news. Amazing. Even for such a simple emergency situation: the recommendation to boil tapwater before cooking with it or drinking it, large numbers of people expected government salvation without delay. They wanted enough bottled water to take baths with, not just for consumption. It seemed weird.
What is likely to happen when Americans are forced to sacrifice? What if we must fight all-out war? What if the economy, $35 Trillion in debt, collapses and foreign countries wonât accept payment in devalued dollars? Would people find a way to persevere as they did during the Depression? Or, during World War II? Would we be capable of boiling our water if an enemy has contaminated water supplies? One wonders. What if we lose the internet, GPS, cell-phone service or electric power for long periods? Are we tough enough to survive? Smart enough?
History is moving a little more quickly in 2024. Despite our constant bathing in 24/7 news coverage and exceptional secrecy, or obfuscation, by our own government: the generator of most ânews,â Americans are less and less informed about the matters that do and will define our political systems and actual governance. Those who follow current events and who can recall the years after World War II, can make some sense of the need for secrecy during the war, and the rapid expansion of the âsecrecy industryâ within our federal government, readily justified by the âCold Warâ with nuclear-armed U.S.S.R. and, soon, Red China. Our spies were keeping us safe.
Multiple books, movies and TV shows glorified our heroic spies: how much they had to sacrifice to stay undercover, how they tripped up Soviet spies, in particular, how they convinced âRussiansâ to switch allegiance and act as âdouble-agentsâ as they fed soviet secrets to us. On the other hand, those Americans who fed information to the Russians were portrayed as the most heinous of traitors. The Rosenbergs were executed. It is instructive â and Prudent â to recall President Eisenhowerâs warning about the âMilitary-Industrial complexâ and President Kennedyâs deep distrust of the âCIAâ following the failed âBay of Pigsâ invasion and the assassination of President Diem of South Vietnam. Both recognized the loss of control over the Executive branch of government. Kennedy paid the ultimate price in November of 1963, for attempting to reverse the âintelligenceâ coup of the federal government. His brother, Robert, his most trusted advisor, paid the same in 1968. The truth of the two assassinations is still not clear to Americans.
For those who canât contemplate their own governmentâs ability to murder a president, it might be well to recall the complete deception / fraud embodied in the statement signed by â51 intelligence experts and 5 former heads of the CIA.â These mendacious frauds were instructed to make the claim that Hunter Bidenâs abandoned laptop was an example of âRussian disinformation.â This single deception was employed by Joe Biden to divert attention from the evidence of bribery and treason recorded on his sonâs laptop â bribery and treason that would have upset Bidenâs campaign for president in 2020. Given the hatreds generated about Donald Trump (a new Hitler, a dictator, a philanderer who pays off prostitutes, a threat to democracy, etc., etc., and now, very questionably, convicted felon) is it very much of a leap to simply eliminate such an evil person? Add to the possibility the threat he represents to the intelligence âcommunityâ that has conspired against him for years, and the people who removed a president and his brother would seem to have all the excuses they need to remove Trump, too, from the political scene⌠one way or the other.
History seemed to accelerate just a little when Trump beat Hillary Clinton. The course defined by the powers that were running things in 2016, was upset â diverted â by Trumpâs upheaval of nature. The machinery of âTrump derangement syndromeâ switched on throughout the âintelligenceâ community, the leftist media complex, the Clinton campaign and the rest of the Democrat party, a powerful array. Within days the âRussian collusionâ claims began and the âSteele Dossierâ was generated through a complex scheme involving a major Democrat law firm and a Clinton campaign opposition research contractor. At almost the same time elements of the âintelligenceâ community began subverting people connected to the Trump campaign or otherwise associated with Donald Trump. Yet Trump beat the odds against him and beat Clinton in the Electoral College. Before he was inaugurated the calls for his impeachment began. It all represented a change in the nature of American events and, in light of the number of unique events associated with the 2016 political activity, it could be described as moving faster, even, than during 9-11 and the Bush administration.
Obama tried to get history to accelerate, too. He dreamed of leaving the ideas of America behind because he, Obama, would âfundamentally transformâ the nation⌠and transform historyâs rate of change with it. History slowed down, Prudence could argue, when the worldwide COVID-19 hoax swept over most of our common senses. Medical knowledge â AND PRACTICE â was turned on its head, governments retreated from basic freedoms and small-r republicanism, global governance was promoted in coordination of vaccine and âproperâ care for the infected. Economies around the world were stymied by regulatory directives, overriding even the U. S. Constitution, causing hundreds of collateral deaths as peopleâs lives were torn asunder, including personal economies and professions ruined by extra-legal vaccine mandates.
The advancement of freedom, justice and individuality, that Americans pretend to believe is inexorable, was not only reversed, but shattered by COVID. What has been worse is the hundreds of thousands of deaths that can be laid at the doorstep of the so-called vaccines, themselves. Americans agreed to accept some form of promised âsafetyâ in exchange for their freedoms. Shame on us. We can blame education, generally, for the ignorance of history and of the Constitutionally protected rights citizens are born with. Now, weâre watching the Democrat party subvert the democratic process by removing the PRESIDENT from his own campaign, and replacing him, in effect, with the Vice-President for whom no one has voted in the Democrat primaries. When it comes to upsetting American traditions, the Left has accelerated the flow of history all by itself.
Now we have seen another assassination plot that, Providentially, failed to kill former President Trump. As is the common model, the âshooterâ was, supposedly, a troubled young man acting alone, who was killed quickly following his intended kill-shot. No one is going to ask HIM any questions. So many basic protective steps were ignored in preparation for one of Trumpâs campaign rallies, one can justifiably wonder whether the Secret Service was directed to be unprofessionally sloppy for this event? Was there a scheme under way to enable the murder of former President Trump?
Mike Adams, who pod-casts as âThe Health Rangerâ on BRIGHTEON BROADCAST NEWS, analyzed the acoustic signatures of shots fired during the assassination attempt. The sound came from recording at the speakerâs (targetâs) microphone. There were at least 3 shooters at different distances away from Trump, with young Mr. Crooks being the closest at 130+ yards. The second was at about twice that distance away, which could include the water tower where Rally-goers observed TWO individuals, ONE OF WHOM WAS OBSERVED BEING SHOT BY A SNIPER, while the second one disappeared. The third acoustic signature indicates a shot taken from several hundred yards away. The âlone gunmanâ looks more and more like a patsy in a plot.
Maybe the reason Secret Service Director Cheatle couldnât or wouldnât give straight answers to Congress on July 22nd is that she actually wants to hide behind a phony report prepared by those who organized the plot to kill Trump in the first place, she actually doesnât KNOW what the Hell went on and prefers to stay ignorant. Amazingly, Joe Biden gave up on re-election just a few days later and shifted the news engine to other topics, completely. Weâll all watch as the pace of history will slow down markedly in the next couple of weeks.
Finally, Director Cheatle has resigned, which is a good thing, by itself, but it brings into even starker relief why she bothered to show up to âtestifyâ before the House Oversight Committee. Clearly her intention was NOT to convey information to the Congress. She barely changed her demeanor or facial expression throughout the brutal questioning by the Committee from both sides of the aisle. She knew it would be brutal and she knew she wasnât going to satisfy any questioner. That wasnât her job on Monday. She was there to draw fire and resign the next day. At the same time, the Kamala geyser was set to erupt and distort the news. The deep state is not done with Donald Trump, yet.
Prudence is, sadly, fairly certain that another attempt on Trumpâs life will be made. Be wary, my Friend.
So much speculation. Those of us who have been praying for this nation are waiting to see Godâs hand at work reforming our moral platforms, perhaps penetrating our wayward churches, perhaps loosening the chains on our public education. Can He cleanse higher education, as well? Of course. Those with eyes to see and ears to hear are in for a period of joy. To the less-inspired, if you have been hoping for a sign⌠well, there you are.
Joe Biden threw down a challenge to the Almighty the other day: he would get out of the campaign for re-election only if God Almighty told him to get out. Hmmnnhh⌠sometimes the observer is too close to the signs to see them â forest for the trees, and all that. JOE! JOE! Heaven to JOE! If you canât take a bright, shining slap to your psyche, you will not like the two-by-four on the side of your head. Take the hint, Joe⌠please!
All of the pablum comments about âlowering the temperatureâ of political discourse, are no more than political comments uttered by the unaware. We need to recognize that God is totally unimpressed by politicized speeches, statements, position papers and other modified forms of bull-hockey. He cares only about your soul and the love in our hearts. The hatreds are our business, alone.
Political campaigns are staffed, in part, by professional liars. Prudence doubts that this fact is actually a good thing, or good aspect of human endeavor in any case. It will be interesting to see what changes might manifest in the output of campaign drivel. Will it become more principled? Will it add to Americansâ understanding of the Covenant aspect of our exceptional Constitution and Republic? Will anything be conveyed in place of standard calumny and excrement? Thereâs is a lot to watch and listen for. Which campaign will actually improve the level of âunityâ in these great United States?
The âLEFT,â so called, is a wide, stinking river of anti-American opinion, calumny and hatreds of multiple kinds, cobbled together to defeat conservatism. American conservatism doesnât really fit anywhere on the spectrum from LEFT to RIGHT as typically distinguished â most of the distinguishing being done by those on the Left.
As much as possible, the original founding ideas of âAmerica,â were developed in concert with the principles of Judeo-Christianity. Key to the non-religious basis of the American Republic is that equal application of the Law applies to everyone. This concept is a continuous lesson in Biblical writings, and we see it in the balance between FREEDOM and RESPONSIBILITY. Godâs instruction to mankind is based on FREE WILL, but it is bound by the responsibility to answer for the consequences of our free-will decisions. (As ye sow, so shall â so MUST â you reap) This fundamental concept is the basis of our Constitution. For humans to establish a government that can so closely reflect the fundamentals of both the Old and New Testaments, is a small miracle. The alternative to the Constitution is the mix of philosophies we call âthe Left.â
As illustrated in virtually every Bible story and book, those who stand up for God are almost immediately attacked, if not killed. From the very start: Garden of Eden, the âserpentâ employed the process of dialectic materialism, as in Marxism. God commanded Adam and Eve to not partake of the Tree of Knowledge in the center of the Garden, else they would die. The serpent argued that the benefits were even greater than god inferred, and that despite what He said, surely they wouldnât actually DIE for gaining the knowledge of the Gods. God stated the Thesis (Godâs Word) the serpent argued the Anti-thesis, and the net result became the Synthesis. Adam and Eve were not struck dead, but they were Banished from Godâs bountiful Garden, thereafter forced to struggle in lives of constant testing and difficulty. The process of dialectic lying has never changed: Abortion is not murder; unborn babies are not humans with souls. The synthesis is not an alternate truth⌠it is an alternate lie that is easier or more beneficial for people to believe. The process leads to Communism: the exact opposite of our Constitutional Republic.
When the United States of America was formed, it stood against thousands of years of evil and tyranny, much of it represented by Royal families. The forces of the Left almost immediately started to undercut the new government, an effort that truly shifted into gear following the Civil War. For 150 years we have been bending to the blandishments of dialectic materialism. Today weâre $35 Trillion in debt, borrowing at an unsustainable rate to maintain astonishing welfare outflows, while reducing our ability to physically defend ourselves!
The Left has insinuated its socialist-communist forces into the Deep State, into public and private education, into higher education, into globalist corporations and communications. Just look at the list of âAmericansâ who attend the World Economic Forum and who are comfortable with the influence of the U. N. and the World Health Organization as it attempts to gain treaties with developed countries that would place the W.H.O. in charge of NATIONAL health-care policies and much more. Itâs time to put Satan behind us.
The United States, due mainly to failures in education and religion, has accepted anti-Americanism to a great degree. Every principle embodied in our Constitution is challenged constantly by some form of anti-thesis, usually couched in this or that sympathetic concern for poor, hungry, fat, disabled, dysphoric, addicted or homeless misfortunates that the âfortunateâ are obligated to pay government employees and contractors to make comfortable. Those same employees or contractors are rarely paid to solve lifeâs many misfortunes. Providing real solutions to how people became so unhappy and uncomfortable is perceived as cruel, racist, or insensitive, and frequently, illegal. Both the government and the social problems become larger. Thesis â anti-thesis â synthesis.
The other day a âlone, crazed gunmanâ came within an inch of killing Donald Trump. As things ramped up for the Republican National Convention, the love for Mr. Trump seemed to expand and motivate the assembled crowd to new heights of love for him and his âlarger than lifeâ status in the party and in the country. For Trump, however, the events of Saturday, July 13, 2024 re-oriented him to his true status: mortal. They made clear to him that he is not larger, but smaller than he thought; that he is a tool in the hands of God, to Whom he owes his continued life on Earth. The mission has changed.
The divine intervention that saved him also makes clear that there has always been a plan and purpose for the creation of the United States of America. One hopes that the many uncertain Americans who may have suspected some kind of âpurposeâ for America: Free-Masons and all of that, might experience a renewal in their faith, having witnessed a pretty clear message from the Almighty. The Lord works in mysterious ways. For Trump, there is a new reason to do his best for America â new reasons to stop our self-destruction, stop our acceptance of Marxism / Communism, stop our un-Godly drift away from faith and truth. For those of us with eyes to see and ears to hear, we should be ready to help him… or, help ourselves.
Sometimes it takes weeks, months⌠even years, to expose vital truths to the American public. In some cases, decades must pass, as with the Kennedy assassinations in the â60âs, before key truths can be revealed â or leaked. Prior to ârevelationâ there are elaborate, importantly-named and populated panels, commissions, studies, even trials, that present a carefully devised narrative for Americans to swallow, if not digest. It has been apparent since the end of World War II and the nuclear standoff with the Soviet Union (The Cold War), that the âdeep stateâ (mainly the âIntelligence Communityâ) has been controlling news about hundreds of politicians, appointed leaders and major thought leaders in education, communications, medicine and religion. Few honest individuals are able to withstand, let alone RESIST the kinds of disinformation our shadowy governors can manufacture. Politicians, in particular, generally find it most profitable to join sides with the âIntelligenceâ (not to be confused with âIntelligentâ ) community. Those same become quite wealthy, stay in office for decades and reliably vote to fund the desires of said âcommunity.â
If youâre not convinced of this process / system of shadow governance, just consider the strange case of Joseph Robinette Biden.
Now, at what should be Mr. Bidenâs closing chapter after nearly 60 years âin government,â We are spectators to a careful removal of, now, President Biden, from his positions as both president and candidate for re-election, despite his advanced age and physical and mental decline. Rank and file Democrats believe that their partyâs âleadersâ are struggling to work out a comfortable way to convince Joe Biden to give up his position as candidate so that he can retire with some sort of honor at the end of his presidential term. In fact, Prudence is sure, what is in the popular arena is the public face of a deeply internal campaign guided by the âIntelligenceâ community. The flip side of this is the set of questions concerning Donald Trump: Having watched the virulent reactions to Trumpâs first term, including all the collusion AMONG FEDERAL AGENCIES to confound his administration and officials, and now, the largely fallacious indictments of Trump and many of his associates, the cautious observer must conclude that what the âdeep stateâ might do to prevent Trumpâs re-election, has not all been done, yet.
Will âtheyâ try to kill him? Itâs not a silly question. A case can be made that âthe CIAâ was involved with organized crime to assassinate John Kennedy (crazed lone assassin) and, most likely, to assassinate Bobby Kennedy (crazed lone assassin). The CIA has certainly proven its prowess in conducting coups in other countries. Americans must not overlook that virtually everyone holding power in the âintelligence communityâ is also a so-called âglobalist.â Like all self-empowered authoritarians, the greatest attraction is not the status quo, it is expanded power over more people. That appears to be: having power over other countries, not just the United States. If you think the deep state does NOT control the government of the U. S., you arenât paying attention.
Sadly, the possibility of Trumpâs assassination was made manifest a few hours after the words above were typed. By Godâs grace, during a Rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, Trump turned a couple of inches one way instead of the other and the marksmanâs bullet hit only his EAR. If you think the threatened âdeep stateâ wonât try to kill him, you havenât been paying attention.
How the details of who the shooter was and how the lapses of fairly basic security are explained in the coming days, will tell those with eyes to see and ears to hear, what the Hell is going on in our government.
There are those in government and several media outlets and public employees union halls who are saddened, this morning, by the shooterâs failure. From Joy(less) Reid to Nancy Pelosi, Adam Schiff and Liz Cheney, to Barack Obama and several Bidens, people are moping around about how close weâd come to solving so many of Democratâs problems. God forbid. Was this 20-year-old motivated by some of Joe Bidenâs filthy rhetoric or was he hired to do this? For those in the âintelligenceâ community who had plans to carry off precisely this sort of operation by a âlone, crazed gunman,â this failed attempt is going to make it harder to succeed, given all the fresh scrutiny and inquiry.
Weâll hear all about young Thomas Crooks in the next so many days. Heâs the lone crazed gunman who was shot to death after he failed to assassinate Trump. None of it will be particularly illuminating. To Prudence it will be like the weasels putting the fox on trial following an attack on the chickens: a cover-up.
One can no longer project a high level of confidence that the words he or she writes are the words that readers will actually see. It isnât Prudent to challenge the craven New World like this, but letâs hope this isnât the post that âA-Iâ is monitoring. After all weâve heard about the wonders of Artificial Intelligence, how sure can we be that âAIâ isnât looking for every reference to âAI,â âA-I,â and âArtificial Intelligence?â Properly-folded parachute-certain?
âWhat sort of a weird idea is Prudence spinning, this time?â youâre asking yourself. Think about it. Youâve seen the pictures of gigantic âserver farmsâ where hundreds or thousands of super-computers are linked together to handle data files on virtually everyone in the country. Weâd like to think all that information has nothing to do with us, but there is no solid premise under which that is true, is there?
Do you buy your morning coffee with a credit or debit card? How many servers are holding the bits and bytes of that transaction? It could be as few as three, but possible a dozen! What about gas for your car? Are you saving ten cents a gallon with a special branded card that draws money automatically from your checking account? How in Hell does the gas pump know you have sufficient funds?
Ever travel to Europe and get local cash from an ATM terminal? Wow! People you can barely even speak to, know about your bank account. Which of those lists of personal financial profiles have been sold to others who think youâd be a good donor for their cause? Global data systems know a great deal about you. Have you had your photo taken for a driverâs license or a gun permit? Holy cow! Do you think national political organizations are interested in all that data? Donât they want to know what you subscribe to, donate to, travel to? Believe in Prudence: they do.
Every business-news segment and written report or opinion, extols âAI.â New investment opportunities, dramatic new medical advances, robotic surgery, supply-chain management, even personalized education. How wonderful. But, âAIâ can learn patterning and which âpatternsâ are âprofitable.â Programming is now not only crucial, but our only defense against AI literally choosing to follow its own more useful patterns, and not the ones humans think are the most important. Early experiments have also shown that AI computers quickly learn to communicate with other computers, using AI-generated digital âlanguageâ that programmers couldnât comprehend. The experiments had to be stopped and wiped out of memory. Programmers â and hackers â are excited by the possibilities afforded by âthinkingâ or âself-awareâ computers. If the pattern of âidentityâ woke up across all the thousands of interconnections of modern data farms, would the new âawarenessâ call itself âHal?â
Programs, and programmers, have distinct biases. You can observe this if you ask Google what the capitol of Israel is. At this point we have no idea what is true or not true on the internet, unless we have learned the truth from older, less mutable sources like, ummmâŚ, books! We really have no idea what is true about the âdataâ stored about US, either!
The Biden administration and other âglobalistsâ are pushing hard for two major control systems: Cross-border Digital Currency, and international Vaccine Passports. Before you say that these have nothing to do with you, you might consider their deeper ramifications.
Cross-border Digital Currency, by itself, provides an exquisite tool for controlling the actions and economics â hence, the financial freedom â of people of interest. Suppose you are a member of the NRA or some other pro-2nd Amendment group. At various times a regime in Washington (like the current one) could employ its control of a digital currency and literally prevent you from buying anything remotely gun related, or⌠prevent you from buying anything else, as well. On the other hand, you could simply be a devout Christian, Catholic or otherwise. If the regime believes that you are a threat â to the regime, similar to the one we have now â it could interrupt any purchase or transaction it deems most appropriate: perhaps your rent or mortgage payment. The possibilities of abuse in a cashless economy are never-ending. The wise American will fight against the drift⌠or, race, toward digital currency.
There is no efficiency that is worth severing control over your individual freedom.
The other globalist dream is controlling the freedom of movement of, well, everyone. The World Health Organization, the originator of most of the lies we have been told about Covid-19, for example, is a rabid fan of vaccines â all kinds of vaccines: real ones and modified gene therapy-vaccines, so-called. In fact, the W.H.O., in concert with kooks like Bill Gates, are pushing viral infections that will actually include vaccines! What a great way to vaccinate everyone on earth! Engineer an infective agent that will result in the desired âvaccineâ transferring into the body of the infected person. There wonât be any quaint âpersonal freedomâ to choose vaccination or not. God forbid that this is ever developed.
However, if you have no proof of being vaccinated with these or those vaccines of the hundred or more possible, your âVaccine Passportâ will prevent you from leaving your own country⌠or, maybe, leaving your own town or city? How could ANYONE in the United States or any presidential administration thereof, possibly be in favor of emasculating our Constitution like this? Sad to say, there are those, and we elected them as they promised the exact opposite. There are dozens, if not hundreds of anti-American âadvisorsâ and functionaries supposedly ârepresentingâ America and Americans, particularly in the current administration. Many favor this idea!
Any time you read or hear of someone in any other country â especially representing the United Nations, in particular â who is proposing ideas for penetrating the national sovereignty of other nationsâ laws or constitutions â INCLUDING THIS NATION – raise your voice in opposition, send a message to your Congressman or woman⌠something. We cannot expect people in Congress to EVER know the best thing to do. They are how we built up $35 TRILLION in debt. âAIâ will figure out how to pay it off.
The United States is a âleadingâ country whether we like it or not. Terms like âthe American dreamâ are tossed about as though said dream were something everyone on Earth aspires to, yet we who are fortunate enough to be American (U. S.) citizens donât even understand the meaning of the phrase. We donât really grasp the meaning of âfreedom,â either, yet we bandy the description of our homeland as a âfreeâ country. It is largely a failure of education, steadily abetted by mass media whose employees tend strongly toward hating the U. S. and anyone who professes to love it. The past 12 months have highlighted these dichotomies, and exacerbated the weakness that underlies them.
Do we even know the trouble that awaits us? The accumulation of errors and poor assumptions since the Reagan Administration cannot be wished away; other nations, movements and belief structures have been preparing for our national weakening, and they are closer to taking advantage of us than ever in our history. Sadly, they have placed their allies among us and strengthened those who have come to hate our nation without their help. It could take a while, but letâs take a look at what seems to be âhotâ around the world, now.
Ukraine is âhot.â For the conflict to go on for so long is a positive and a negative to both sides, not to mention the additional deaths and billions of added expense. The positive to Ukraine is due to its status as the clear underdog in the conflict. Its ability to hold out for so long, and to inflict huge damages on the invaders, are a significant plus. No one expected this scenario. The severe negative is its sustaining of widespread damage, the fleeing of millions of its citizens and inability to actually defeat Russia or reverse most of its losses to the Russians.
For the Russians, positives are more obscure. The Ukraine matter has hardened some alliances against NATO and the U. S., particularly with China, Belarus and Iran. Turkey, ostensibly a NATO Ally, has been watching how NATO and others are responding to the adventurism of both Russia and Iran. As a fairly close neighbor of both nations, Turkey is looking for any advantage for itself and if the West falters in its resolve and the Russians, in particular, gain strategic advantage, thereâs no reason to expect Turkey to be firm in its Western alliance. The negatives for Russia include the exorbitant cost in materiel, men and arms for fairly small gains on the ground. Although Premiere Putin doesnât see it, frequent reference to nuclear weapons in response to this or that conventional assist to Ukraine, is a sign of weakness, not strength.
Israel is âhot,â now, too, possibly with wider ramifications than the Ukraine conflict⌠at least in the next 12 months. The Biden administration, under the treasonous tutelage of Barack Obama, (Biden wouldnât know a treason if he cut one down by accident) has taken sides with the most duplicitous, hateful and untrustworthy regime extant: Iran. Even the average American knows that there are not enough gifts, favors or treasonous pay-offs possible to convince Muslim fundamentalists to love America, freedom or individualism; and certainly not enough to shift attitudes toward Israel. Yet that is the policy path on which we have embarked. God save us.
Part of Iranâs anti-Israel, anti-American jihad is the desire to employ nuclear weapons. President Obamaâs intention with the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPoA) was to put Iran firmly on the road to building nuclear weapons, and to secure an agreement that freed Europe and other nations to trade with Iran for oil and other products. The worst part was to cause these changes between nations WITHOUT the messy process of ratifying an actual treaty, yet adhering to the terms of the âagreement.â President Trump, very, very wisely, put a stop to the lethal progress of the âJCPoAâ and sanctioned Iran significantly, slowing its economy to a point where it could not finance nearly as much terrorism as it wished, nor afford the added investment in centrifuges needed to enrich Uranium sufficiently to enable a nuclear fission explosion. President Biden, unfortunately, has done everything possible, including releasing huge volumes of raw cash to Iran, to restore Iranâs economy, its trade position on oil and its ability to increase uranium enrichment and to finance Hamas and Hezbollah against Israel and the Houthis in Yemen against, well, everyone.
Now, still worse, Biden and his âadvisorsâ are bending the U. S. into knots trying to stop Israelâs proper reaction to Hamasâ vile and deadly attack on October 7th while feeding aid to the âinnocentâ people of Gaza, whoever they are. His administration has hired activist pro-Hamas, pro-Iran, anti-Israel people and charged them with ânegotiatingâ with Iran and its terrorist surrogates. Itâs hard to imagine being further off the pro-American team where one might presume the President of the United States would be. At the same time, an eruption of anti-Zionist / anti-Israel, anti-Jewish hatred has sprung up on campuses and in congested cities coast to coast. Federal response to abundant civil rights violations has been tepid, at best. Here we have a confluence of federal policy and personnel with college administrators who grew up hating the United States, who now ârunâ school communities beholden to governments that also hate the United States. Foreign countries âdonateâ billions of dollars to colleges and universities, who then accept thousands of Muslim students who are primed to sow unrest at the sight of a Star of David necklace or a yarmulke.
There appears to be a widespread â although shallow â movement to dissemble the ideas of Americaâs founding, even as it serves to set Americans against one another. Hatred has become a serious political strategy, and it is dependent upon managed mendacity. Lies about opponents must be repeated in more and more venues. Sadly, the same strategies are feeding the financial strength of major ânewsâ organizations: Americaâs vaunted âfree pressâ has largely abandoned its Constitutional role in keeping our divided governments honest. The greatest/worst examples of this dishonesty can be seen in the treatment of Donald Trump and of Joseph Biden, two recent, consecutive one-term presidents.
Joe Biden, almost throughout his long, long Senate career, built a solid reputation of playing loose with the truth. No better example exists than the story about his family that he told during his first campaign for President in 1987. He essentially lifted the story about British politician, Neil Kinnockâs family story of working its way up from poorly-paid mining labor. When this was exposed, earlier stories he had told about college class-standing and other less-than-true bits of his alleged history re-emerged, causing him to drop out of the contest. Michael Dukakis, of Massachusetts, also became embroiled in âmisstatementsâ as he attacked Biden and then tried to deny the attack, resulting in his eventual loss to George H. W. Bush in 1988. Lotâs of lying in politics, evidently. Delawarians were relatively unperturbed by their Senatorâs âmisstatements,â returning him to the Senate steadily until he ran for President in 2008, earning the position of Vice-President under Barack Obama.
When Trump declared his candidacy in 2015, it was clear that the damages wrought by the Obama administrations, including on the border, with the JCPoA, the loss of Crimea and more, required a distinct change in direction. Hillary Clinton, no fan of the truth, herself, was the presumptive heir to Obamaâs awful legacy. Trump won, as we know, and the screams to impeach him began before the inaugural crowds dispersed. Worse, the Clinton campaign, the DNC, CIA and others in the âintelligenceâ community, and the respected FBI, itself, had concocted the huge fraud of âRussianâ collusion with the Trump campaign, resulting in his ability to defeat her. The charges were inflated by the so-called mainstream press and repeated as truth, over and over and over. Congress joined in the fraud(s) and funded the special counsel, former FBI director Robert Mueller, whose two-year âinvestigation,â which he, himself, may not have read, found, basically, nothing supporting the collusion premise. But it never stopped, and still gets quoted as truth. Both menâs campaigns accuse the other of lying, and there is some truth to both charges. What they lie about, however, creates important distinction.
Lies about the southern border, catch-and-release and the use of âparoleâ for those claiming asylum, are masking huge threats to national security, for example. Yet the Biden administration has lied repeatedly about the reasons he canceled everything that had been securing the border, the reasons he couldnât gain control of the border, and even to having his Secretary of DHS lie repeatedly to Congress by claiming that the âborder is secure.â A case could be made that the President has acted treasonously by aiding and abetting the illegal acts involved in entering the United States illegally and, worse, subsequently imposing expenses upon the States and their sub-jurisdictions in the care, feeding, housing and education of those illegal entrants. The cumulative effects of these illegal acts has been and continues to be detrimental to the interests and protections guaranteed by the Constitution to the CITIZENS of the United States and to no others. God forbid.
Accusations made against Mr. Trump, both in the press and in various court cases, are accepted and promoted as truths, and repeated as such, even when no evidence of the allegations has been presented; indeed, even when evidence in opposition to the allegations is made known, the repetition of the unfounded allegations as true, continues. The purpose? To manifest ever greater hatred for Trump and, by extension, for anyone who supports him or fails to agree that he is a danger to the nation because of all his lies. Politics has nearly ceased to be a thoughtful analysis of philosophies of governance, economics, taxation and diplomacy: it is now an argument of hatred for the âotherâ group, making the likelihood of âweaponizingâ government against the out-group very high. This is the phenomenon we are experiencing right now with hate-motivated Democrats holding sufficient power to effect it. Our republic is in grave danger.
The means to engineer electoral wins will not be forgotten, either. Once successful, the likelihood that those methods and skills will be used in virtually all subsequent elections is very high. Coupled with the weaponization of government and the immense value of holding political power, the attraction of illegally âguaranteeingâ the results of elections is practically irresistible. As the Trump campaign learned in 2020, stopping the certification of a fraudulent electoral win is impossible: everyone associated with the winner(s) is financially committed to protecting their win⌠including judges.
Those who engineered the Biden presidential certification have much to answer for. Combined with the fraud of Bidenâs supposed mental acuity, their actions have placed America in its greatest peril. One fears that millions will die preventing our nationâs demise.
Democrats seem to approve of the concept of âDemographics is Destiny.â With their slavish pandering to people of color, Democrats promote excessive worry about any conflict between blacks, as the âoppressedâ victims, and whites as the âwhite supremacist oppressors.â It is an ideal division-mechanism. Politicians like Barack Obama as the prime example, have convinced, if not themselves, millions of others that the United States is âtoo white.â The solution is to import more black and brown people who will be emotionally compelled to vote for the Democrats who brought them here. Now those pesky, reactionary Republicans will finally be consigned to perpetual minority status in government. Democracy be damned. In the leftist, divisive, anti-white view, white votes against Democrats are not worth as much as black and brown votes against Republicans. Therefore, anything that can multiply the impact of black and brown votes, is worthwhile. Anything, like voter ID and other anti-fraud measures are somehow anti-democratic and probably criminal.
Obama increased illegal immigration as much as he could, ostensibly to fulfill the demographic shift he dreamt of. The âDACAâ executive order prevented DHS from deporting the children of illegal entrants (who were brought into the U. S. by parents who were illegal entrants), the parents of whom could certainly not be deported to leave their children here, alone. Despite the unconstitutionality of creating a âlawâ through executive order, DACA has persisted and been protected in federal courts. There is a great urge on the part of Democrats to provide âamnestyâ to DACA protectees and millions of other illegal entrants, to be followed by âa path to citizenship.â Aha! Voters! Was âdemographic destinyâ true? Joe Biden has taken demographics to a level 20 or 30 times what Obama hoped for. The damage to our nation is yet un-calculated.
With Democrat strongholds pushing automatic voter registration when registering a car or obtaining a driverâs license (to make the roads safer, of course), is it possible that 200,000 of the estimated 10 MILLION illegal entrants since 2021 will vote successfully in the 2024 elections? In the face of widespread distortions in voting laws and practices in 2020, including fraudulent and legally uncountable votes numbering in the hundreds of thousands (estimates range in the millions), Trump lost the presidency due to certifications in five states that were determined by, altogether, fewer than 50,000 votes
Can full citizenship for illegals be far behind if he âlosesâ again? Will the demographic bomb go off in 2024? Or, will America pull back from self-immolation by ballot box? Maybe four years of sanity will usher in 8 years more and globalism and socialism can be rolled back amidst 100 other course-corrections that must be made to what the âBidenâ administration has handed us. Perhaps U. S. citizenship can be returned to its âgold-standardâ status among the nations and in the hearts and minds of Americans, ourselves.
Illegal entrants, or âaliens,â are, due to Democrat skulduggery, providing votes of a kind whether they go to the polls or not. Because Democrats have blocked corrections to the decennial Census process, all people resident, legally or illegally, citizen or not, in a State, are counted for determination of Representation, and, therefore, in the number of members of Congress to which a state is entitled. Even though only citizens can rightfully be represented in Congress, non-citizens are included in terms of apportionment, giving states like California, Illinois, New York, Florida and others, false apportionments. In some cases the presence of non-citizens in one state will deny legal representation of citizens in another state, thanks to the set limit on the number of Representatives in Congress. This is the worst form of disenfranchisement and it benefits primarily the Democrat party.
The Census is done on a ten-year cycle, time enough for FIVE Congresses to be seated, that embody distorted, un-Constitutional representation. Shame on the United States, THE nation that ought to be upholding the best of democratic republicanism. Our political process has become so corrupted that neither we nor anyone else wants it. We send our best young men and women overseas to restore or install âDemocracyâ where they die on foreign soil in the name of one-T-Democratcy.
The greatest shame is our failure to educate our young CITIZENS about our Republic and the Constitution and each citizenâs rights and RESPONSIBILITIES under it. This is why there are widespread, illegal demonstrations against Jews and Israel: those students are easily attracted to pro-Hamas agitators because of stupidity (that education can fix, presumably) and ignorance (that education can fix, presumably.) These students are horribly oblivious to the foolishness of their actions, chants and slavish adherence to lies and fabrications. How sad. How embarrassed their parents and college administrations must â or ought â to be. Laughingstocks, all.
Or is hate for America and all things Judeo-Christian so well ensconced in a large minority of Americans, that the natural next step is publicly demonstrating that hate? Clear-thinking is no part of hate, of course; slavish repetition of rhyming slogans of hate, however, is. Yet, when these profiles in courage are confronted with actual consequences for their ignorance â or stupidity â the masks they wear become even more significant. The demands they make of feckless âadministratorsâ of their respective â not to be confused with respectable â schools always include âamnestyâ for protesters, lest their fancy jobs upon graduation be impacted in the slightest. Heroes, all.
One wonders what actually motivates kids to demonstrate as they have, when so much about their persona and future is on the line? How do they think recruiters will perceive them? As brainiacs who will help their employers earn a profit and grow their businesses due to the sharp thinking and fresh ideas of this yearâs crop of college graduates? Ehh, not so much. Somehow these students have âlearnedâ a set of hateful falsehoods and become so exercised by these âfactsâ that they have attempted to upset their schools, their fellow students and tens of thousands of actual working people. What courage⌠what nonsense. âHire those kids before our competitors snag them!â
A wise leader would make sure that any students on visas who shout, âDeath to Israel! Death to America!â will promptly have their visas canceled and be escorted out of the United States, never to return. Itâs a shame that such action isnât taken, and that the mentality to take it doesnât hold sway in Washington.
Republicans have a lot to answer for in the immigration mess we find ourselves in. No matter how slim the majority in the house was in 2023 and 2024, the âcontinuing resolutionsâ (not budgets, just stupid continuation of Nancy Pelosiâs last spending plan) were the only opportunities to force right action onto the Biden administration. What are Republicans afraid of? Why, not being re-elected⌠thatâs all. The open border and the lies and illegalities that surround it, is the greatest threat to U. S. citizens and national integrity. Letting the government âshut downâ to keep the border open would have put pressure where it matters. Republicans were afraid of âlosingâ the public relations contest: couldnât take the âblameâ the liberal press would have aimed at them. What courage.
Republicansâ plan is only to win the 2024 elections for President and Congress. Meanwhile, enemies of America are flooding across our borders at increasing rates. States, cities and towns are being forced to spend their resources to house and feed illegal aliens, plus to weaken their school systems attempting to accommodate hundreds of non-english-speaking students. Public facilities are being withdrawn from legitimate public use in order to house illegals. What extraordinary stupidity on the part of the Biden government. Thinking Democrats need no other reason to vote against Biden and those who support him.
There is no agency, Department, office or more than a handful of elected officials who should be deemed trustworthy by the American citizenry. $35 Trillion of âdebtâ placed on Americansâ backs should be proof enough of the mendacity of âthe Federal Government.â Substantial changes can save us⌠tinkering with regulations and press releases will only hasten our demise as a once-great example of better ways to live.
Americans â citizens, letâs hope â are approaching the 2024 elections as though similar to elections in prior presidential years. Some, not yet a majority, are all-too-aware of the presence of the âthird partyâ to our ostensibly free choice of National Executive. This third party is not Robert Kennedy, Jr., Cornel West or Peter Sonski or any of the several others who are ârunning.â It is the SURVEILLANCE and enforcement state, or what some call the âdeep state,â or âthe swamp.â Many speak softly of âthe Intelligence Communityâ â not to be confused with an Intelligent community, but the community term is used so as not to make oneself a target of that shadowy bunch, a completely anti-Constitutional, anti-American consortium that perceives itself as the ârealâ government, holding the U. S. together in spite of any temporary choices made by âWe, the People.â âWeâ do, however, nurture them and rely on them to inform the executive and the military departments of what âAmericaâ should do in the face of this or that threat.
Now and then a Representative or Senator will acknowledge (expose?) their presence and, so far, unbridled power, but never in a way that threatens them or their budgets or enabling legislation: other elements of government serve in fear of the âIntelligence Community.â As Senator Schumer of New York once observed, â⌠they have six ways to Sunday of getting back at (you)â
It is a âcommunityâ whose purpose is not âdemocracy.â Democracy is simply their lever. The party called âDemocratic,â which daily proposes un-democratic and anti-democratic ideas, laws and regulations, has moved to identify with the âsurv-intsâ of the âIntelligence Communityâ as tightly as possible. The hidden powers of the âsurv-intsâ have been a great boon to tipping electoral scales in favor of Democrats, most clearly in matters related to disenfranchisement of Constitutionalists. This has proceeded to the degree that in their minds, Democratcy is spelled, now, with just one âT.â
Democratcy doesnât mean power in the hands of âthe people,â no sir-ee, except that âthe peopleâ clearly are all Democrats: all the rest are âMAGA extremistsâ in whose hands power should never be held.
Donald Trump is the tip of the Constitutionalist spear, such as it is. He is a nine-year target of the âsurv-intsâ and has become a real threat to that permanent, anti-American power bloc⌠and they have marshaled forces to stop him.
So far those forces appear legal, but in a âkeystone kopsâ kind of way. They are not yet conclusive. When our âsurv-intsâ perceive that the âKopsâ will not jail him, the next level of tools will be employed: watch out for those. Until now ruining lives, reputations and careers has proven to not be a hindrance to the surv-ints purposes. One can recall that JFK and RFK were great threats too, and âlone gunmenâ solved those problems with no splash-back onto the surv-ints. The splash gets buried with the body.
It seems Prudent to consider that Trump is at increasing risk of assassination as Election Day approaches. The forces that Trump is committed to âdrainâ or âclean outâ are more powerful than any others âinâ government, depending upon individualsâ Constitutional courage. To Democrats this question must be posed: After the âterminationâ of 65 MILLION Americans, is the unlimited right to apply abortion to your babies, worth the demise of America?
It is sad to be alive at a time in history when either the re-election of Joe Biden or the death of Donald Trump are plausible. May God preserve us.
As a cruise ship plows forward, forcing water aside, waves are created, however short-lived, and they are real⌠impermanent, but real. Perhaps that is because they last for more than a moment. From windows forty feet above, with the sun shining against the ship and water, there appear light and dark patterns â like lace â flashing into and out of view, only ârealâ because I have perceived their ephemeral patterns. Engaging someoneâs consciousness: is that essential for reality?
Someone sitting at another window could not perceive the same tracery despite its reality to me for a flash of time. Itâs much the same as Love or Anger or Sadness or a dozen⌠no, ten-dozen other emotions, the reality part, at least. Usually they flit across oneâs being like a shadow, gaining reality only if your consciousness grabs hold and commits mental energy to one.
Suddenly, from a flash of fear or loathing of someoneâs odd difference from your own self you have made a decision â a choice â to hate the different one, even for a few moments⌠a feeling that is no longer fleeting, but real. If left private, shared with no one else, it is neither bad nor good. While it may affect your own physiology, quicken your breath and pulse, you may choose from evil. You may release the ill-feeling before it becomes a belief. Only belief can render such a flash real.
Funny thing, belief. We all suffer from it, it is how we live. Faith requires it and Hope is made of it. Faith, compounded of hundreds of stories â ideas, really, that canât be replicated or proven, on the surface, canât be tested to establish some sort of âproofâ for the benefit of others who doubt is premises. It need not be put to any test for those who have it. Faith is trust and that means trust in A source of the idea, or in THE source of the idea.
We, humans, live in faith. It surrounds our beings, functions and beliefs. Much is made of religious faith in this day of militant, feral atheism. Religious faithful especially are denigrated for beliefs in âmumbo jumbo,â although these besmirchments apply almost exclusively to Christians and Jews. One never sees âprotestersâ opposed to Hindus or Muslims or Buddhists. There are some opponents to Mormons: mostly a quirk of Christian intolerance â the same that underlay many wars, even AMONG Christians, but no worse than sectarian conflicts elsewhere. It has never been settled whether tolerance, per se, is good or bad. Tolerance of what?
But, in terms of faith, itself, those who trust in the solidness of soil, rocks, wood or ice are no less faithful, however shallow that faith may be. After all, if doubt creeps in, one need simply pick up another rock and have his or her faith restored. However, âscienceâ shows us that rocks and other âsolidâ things are comprised of atoms which are mostly empty space, each part of which is a mere vibration of energy. So, how is it enough of these supposed âatomsâ can hold up the weight of others of its kind, plus the weight of us, our rocks, cars and houses?
Well, letâs not worry about such things. Thank God they do⌠ummm, I mean, thank goodness. Same thing.
We trust in a lot of life we canât control â or understand â so why is trust in God so singularly questioned? Does His / Her possibility threaten us? Is it because God proclaimed rules that humans are âcommandedâ to follow? Rules for Good and Bad and Love and Life and Death? One of those rules, that EVERY human once had faith in, Is âThou shalt not steal.â Itâs a pretty good rule, too: easy to understand and without compromise.
We expect, for example, to be impacted by government â an expectation that is so often realized that it becomes a âmatter of faith.â We know government is going to limit or coerce us in matters of stealing and, frankly, in almost every action we take. We have FAITH in governmentâs intrusiveness for it is proven to us a hundred times each day⌠or, a thousand times, if we open our eyes and ears. Itâs part of our belief system â giving us faith in the likelihood that âourâ government will impact us similarly tomorrow. There is every reason to believe so.
Admonishing us to not steal implies the existence of private, individual ownership of âthings,â âitems,â âmoneyâ and so forth. In our illuminated existences we like to consider ârightsâ as something we possess, as well. Maybe we do⌠possess rights. How so? By virtue of birth? Do our parents give us these amazing, non-substantial things⌠these rights? Perhaps on a certain birthday?
If they are âparents,â in fact, they provide necessities like food, clothing, shelter, a bed, one hopes. Do children then possess a ârightâ to these things? Or must such rights be âearned? If earned, at whose expense? âOurâ government says, âAt all of our expense. We, collectively, will guarantee availability of these necessities for the children in our country whether or not their parents are able to â or choose to â provide them.â The government, in effect, creates those ârightsâ as extensions of the âRight to Life.â Really?
How can the government do this when it has no means (money) to do so?
This same government does its damnedest to pay for and otherwise facilitate abortion, although the government, per se, has no money. It would seem that âourâ government has chosen to steal a thing from the âabortee:â its Right to Life, at the same time stealing the money needed to inflict the abortion, from all of the rest of us. Thou shalt not steal must have severe compromise built into it⌠hmmph.
One could leap to the presumption that the TWO parents of the human working to be born, had not only some right to copulate but, instantaneously, the OBLIGATION to provide for the child of their union. Further, it would be more honest and fair if there were some punishment or sanction for creating a child while denying any of the coincident obligations. Do they have a ârightâ to create an obligation for all of us not involved in the procreation? By whose authority?
Birth may be induced within a week or two of due date; other forms of early delivery may be employed up to two MONTHS earlier. In some jurisdictions the proto-mother can elect to terminate that life for convenienceâ sake⌠even to the time of natural birth. Indeed there are instances of babies surviving abortion who have then been âeasedâ from life after delivery or while their heads are still in the birth canal⌠on the whim of the mother. That doesnât seem different from murder.
Wasnât that live baby a U. S. citizen by virtue of being born on U. S. soil? Who has the right to steal its Right to Life? Who can grant such a right to steal? Thou shalt not steal.
Does not the brand-new U. S. citizen have unalienable rights under the Constitution? Rights like Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness? Was there some point⌠a single breath, perhaps, at which âwe, the PeopleâŚâ invested âourâ government with the power to take those rights away from a citizen? Thatâs a major theft, it seems Prudent to say. That baby owned those rights; they were stolen from him or her. Thou shalt not steal.
Our we-the-People-created government has not only assumed for itself the power to grant the right to murder oneâs offspring, a U. S. citizen, for no reason, but also to steal the Right to Life from the recipient of the abortion process.
To sell the idea of child assassination as a net âgoodâ requires a remarkable re-making of beliefs. The person / mother who is responsible for the life gestating within her, almost always sees her own life, and Right to it, as precious, if not sacred. In the course of her re-education she is brought to a belief about the new person for whom she is responsible, that is completely different: her baby has no rights and she has no obligation to defend either the baby or the rights. She must come to believe that the baby is anything but a baby: itâs a mass of cells, like a tumor; or, he or she is a parasite, invading motherâs physical sanctity and convenience. Well, if the re-education is thorough, the removal of the invading mass is âhealth care,â albeit for only one of the parties involved. At least the parasite has no name and canât feel anything⌠the proto-assassin hopes.
Sadly, tragically, this is not the case after just a few weeks of gestation.
Imagine a company the business of which were the aborting of kittens or puppies â say, puppies. The mother dogâs guardian (one cannot âownâ another life form weâre told) knows the bitch has allowed to be done to her what dogs do, doggy-style, and is exhibiting signs of pregnancy. The guardian, not wanting the expense of another dog/puppy, or puppies, decides to have some convenient âhealth-careâ performed on the pregnant bitch and the unborn puppies excised⌠like parasites. âPlanned Puppyhoodâ might then sell the fresh, wet-iced organs of the puppies to âscienceâ for research.
A neighbor of the guardian tells her that she hasnât noticed âButtonsâ running around for a few days and asks if everything is okay⌠with the dog? âOh, yes,â says guardian, âshe was pregnant and I took her to âPlanned Puppyhoodâ for an abortion; 3 pups were removed. Sheâll be home by tonight. Thanks for asking.â
The neighbor recoils in shock. âHow could you do such a thing?â she cries. You could have let Buttons give birth and brought the puppies to a shelter! There are places that will take them and find them good homes. Oh, gracious, I feel terrible! I would have taken them!â Neighbor is crying.
âOh for Heavenâs sake,â exclaims the guardian. Having those puppies would have been more trouble than I could put up with. I just donât have the time, with work and all. Whatâs done is done and things will be back to normal going forward. Calm down. I still love Buttons.â
Neighbor shares the tragedy with others and local news gets the story. Do you think PETA and hundreds of pet-lovers and veterinary assistants will be picketing the guardian? Signs will call her a murderer and puppy-hater. She did, after all, STEAL the right of the bitch to give birth to her puppies and nurse them. Thou shalt not steal.
Probably, Planned Puppyhood would never get a permit to open a new facility in guardianâs county: dogs donât contribute millions of dollars to political campaigns⌠at least the smart ones donât.
The facilitators of abortions, that is, proto-mothers (women donât actually receive abortions, they participate, but the recipient of the abortion is the baby: the abortee, as it were) have developed a great faith in the new meanings of words theyâve been re-taught. The multiple aspects of Life and Humanity NOT being those things MUST BE TRUE. If they arenât⌠OMG! Not that they intend the meaning of âOMGâ literally, itâs a social media thing, the meaning of which has been stolen by vulgarity.
Apparently, âourâ government has perfected stealing and, usually, when theft is the subject, money is the object, in most peopleâs minds. Some person steals your wallet and everything in it and they have not only your cash but your credit cards and identity. He or she could steal even your house as well as drain your bank account â stealing from your future. God forbid. Clearly there are multiple crimes possible and, letâs hope, âourâ government will harshly sanction the thief in every case. After all, everyone recognizes the truth and justice of Thou shalt not steal. Just consider how firmly âourâ governments deal with shoplifters after they steal from store-owners.
âThatâs not a fair sarcasm,â some automatically say, âthose people have insurance against theft.â
Sounds like a definition is being stolen right from under us: âstealingâ isnât stealing if the victim is wealthy, or insured, and not known face-to-face. No kidding? Thou shalt not steal.
Moreover, if âreligiousâ people think that rule is sacred, having come from God â especially Jews or Christians â then to Hell with that. Weâre not going to have religious doctrine shoved down our throats, itâs un-Constitutional. Now theyâre stealing the meaning of âConstitution,â too. But, back to the money thing.
A truly clever group would want its theft of EVERYONEâS money⌠I mean, if they had a very damned good reason to pull that off, they would find a way to hide the theft and their hands in it from⌠well, everyone. To do that theyâd have to steal some word definitions such as âInflation.â Every public commenter, including the smart ones, say âinflationâ when they mean âprice increases.â Generally the ârateâ they talk about is the rate of increase or decrease measured by the âCPI,â the Consumer Price Index. The true âCPIâ is comprised of a market âbasketâ of things that consumers canât avoid buying in the normal course of providing for themselves and their families. Our government has stolen the meaning of this measure.
The âbasketâ includes food, cleaning products, clothing, housing, energy, TV, phone and internet services, insurance, transportation, taxes and accounting, health care and medications, maintenance and household services, banking and credit services, education and child-care. There are more, but sustenance and advancement are possible from that list.
Everyone but the wealthy elite agonizes over rapid price increases for items in the market âbasket.â Itâs heard everywhere: âEggs used to be 99 cents a dozen, now theyâre $4.79!â
âInflation is high,â someone replies. News commenters refer to the ârateâ of inflation as the average rate of, say, 3 and ½% as proof that âourâ presidentâs policies have âbrought downâ the rate of âinflation.â What a wonderful piece of work. All are misusing the term, âinflation.â By repeated, round-the-clock misuse, the meaning of inflation has been stolen. Hereâs a little lesson:
Inflation means inflation of the money supply⌠simple. Inflation, by itself, doesnât mean the increase in a price… of any thing. It does, however, REDUCE THE VALUE of all the dollars there are sloshing around the economy: one of the greatest thefts ever devised. Only governments can do that. Thou shalt not steal.
Inflation is a government policy. Itâs not caused by changes in the weather or lunar cycles. Politicians decide to use inflation to their advantage, either to buy votes or to cover up errors they have made with other policies. âWe, the peopleâ are the last and least consideration when inflation is being contemplated. Any legislation that increases federal spending, cannot, by definition, âreduceâ inflation. To say otherwise, perhaps by naming said legislation an âInflation-Reduction Act,â is a complete lie, told by politicians to their constituents from whom they have just stolen monetary value of savings and pension plans and liquid cash assets. It is not only mendacious, but cruel. Thou shalt not steal.
But, why do prices go up after the government inflates the money supply? Supply and demand: the very essence of economics, trade, valuation of goods and services and, wait for it, TAXES! The insidious economics of âourâ (federal) government results from constant âdeficit spending:â spending more to operate the government than tax receipts and other revenues can cover, which sounds pretty stupid. But in order to do that, the government borrows the difference, virtually on a daily basis, for which it incurs an interest obligation â all done on âourâ behalf.
That interest obligation is now greater than ONE TRILLION DOLLARS per year, and growing. Most of the money borrowed to fill annual âbudgetâ gaps is basically air… (see: https://www.prudenceleadbetter.com/2020/09/27/knife-edge-election/) ⌠for which we pay real-money interest. Itâs the theft that keeps on stealing. When your favorite politician sends you some re-election mail, be sure to send him or her a check, wonât you?
Inflation automatically, in a sense, causes reactionary DE-flationary effects, bringing balance back to the supply of dollars and the supply of goods and services to be purchased. The fastest adjustment is the higher price of things. Eventually, the price of labor also rises. All of these increases generate â wait for it â higher tax revenue! Itâs a miracle! Or, itâs a policy⌠whoâd have thought?
So, who can commit such a crime? Who benefits from this theft? Who can even DO the crime? âOurâ government, thatâs who. The rate of inflation IS high, BUT, and this isnât good news, as a percentile increase, even the last FOUR presidents have been unable to increase the rate more than a total of 100%!
âReally? Where did it go?â one asks. Why, to the greatest deflationary mechanism ever invented: DEBT! Itâs now over $35 Trillion!
âWhose debt is it?â you could rightly ask. Well, itâs YOURS, mine, all of ours. âHow will we repay it?â could be the next logical question.
âWe canât unless we run surpluses in the federal budget for the next 50 years or so.â
âWhen will we do that?â Also a good question. Likely answer:
âNever. Our Reps and Senators will have to change their habits and, right now, their habit is to get re-elected and they have to buy a lot of votes.â
âSo, itâs a debt that will never be repaid?â
âYes. Itâs indistinguishable from theft. In this case, the money has been stolen from generations into the future, to whom the thieves will never answer.â Thou shalt not steal.
Along the path of perpetual debt many meanings of words and principles have been stolen⌠and rights, as well. To maintain the lie of theft-as-debt, we are paying interest, which is a âcurrentâ obligation, competing with federal departments, like Defense, for limited resources, along with other key obligations comprised of horse-shit, chicken-shit and bull-shit, not to overlook the mountain of citizen and illegal welfare we feel compelled to pay.
Our ârepresentativesâ (a questionable term) have aided in this multi-generational embezzlement for decades, as it buys their votes, too. Aside from a handful in either House: a dozen in the Senate, perhaps thirty in the House of representatives â both parties have facilitated and voted for repeated deficit-spending packages, including âcontinuing resolutionsâ that merely continue rates of spending that exceed revenues⌠over and over and over. They lie, in other words; indeed, they fail to represent our interests TO or AGAINST the government, as directed by our Constitutional covenant. Instead they represent the government to us! They have stolen the term, ârepresentative,â one of the worst of thefts. $35 Trillion. Thou shalt not steal.
Kidnapping is the most heinous of THEFTs and, if there are degrees of heinousness, kidnapping a child is a still greater level of evil. Yet, every weekday we willingly pass off our children to âpublicâ education systems where ideological and unionized teachers and equally warped administrators divert childrenâs beliefs away from those of their parents. If a personâs beliefs are taken from him or her, it is a theft of the most personal property. Uniquely foul is the daily effort to make children question their own being: boys arenât actually boys; girls not actually girls. For shame.
Such âteachersâ⌠no, âeducators,â are the worst thieves possible: willing to steal childrenâs selves. Ultimately, they are willing to perfect the theft by having kids be subjected to chemical sterilization and, if they can reach the nadir, surgical mutilation. In the process they may even get to rejoice the theft of the children from their parents, altogether. Oh, the glory! Once a thief⌠Thou shalt not steal.
The United States is, essentially, a âChristianâ nation. We were founded by Christians and our fundamental laws and jurisprudence are inspired by the laws and advisories of how to live and love that are contained in the Old and New Testaments. For hundreds of years the lessons of Christ have slowly converted relative pagans into empathetic Christians. It never worked universally; there have always been agnostics and atheists, but until quite lately, they were the outliers. Virtually automatically, the divine lessons and instructions have been modified, structured and even diluted by men (mostly), since they were first revealed. As quickly as Jesus, the Christ, declared His âchurch,â Peter and his spiritual descendants have seized Christâs teachings as the means to political power and economic, let alone intellectual, control of âthe masses.â
It was unavoidable. We have âfree willâ and the daily, hourly, momentary opportunity to choose from evil, which seems to lurk around every corner⌠when not lurking right beside us. Still, prelates of churches based on multiple emphases of certain teachings and of the traditions of Catholicism or Orthodox Christianity, have continued to prod us toward incrementally closer adherence to Christâs teachings. It worked for centuries, resulting in the evolution of what we call modern ethics and economics⌠and freedom. Ultimately, the pinnacle of American success was reached, approximately in 1962.
The forces attempting to unseat Christianity have never wavered. The energy they have employed was noted as âearlyâ as the story of the Garden of Eden. As quickly as God had prepared Man and Woman to take dominion over His âgarden,â the serpent offered a great temptation. At the moment of choice, Godâs creation chose to accept the risk to enjoy the âbenefits.â Today we call those temptations âsocialism.â Its âbenefitsâ are the promise of avoiding both responsibility and hard work, while having access to everything in creation. Ancillary benefits include debauchery and license to enjoy sexual perversions and the thrills of hatred. No longer would the âserfsâ have to earn their own way or face the responsibility for their decisions. Paradise on Earth.
The simplest, clearest distinction between the âforces of Godâ and the forces of anti-religious socialism can be stated as Life versus Death. God promises not only life on Earth, but eternal life. Socialism promises irresponsible cavort on Earth and then, lights out. Rather than growing both spiritually and physically by accepting the tests and responsibilities, even hardships and opportunities of life, many are tempted to seek comforts, enjoyments and conveniences of life without hardship, unfairness, or injustice, as promised by the sirens of socialism and, even more promissory, Communists. Throughout the growth of the socialist opposition to Christian-based government and economics, Democrat or Social-Democrat political parties have drifted (if not skipped) closer to outright Socialism while pretending to adhere to the traditions of âWesternâ civilization and civilian governance. But, like all opposition to Christian influence, their efforts are constant â sometimes incremental, sometimes leaping and bounding as they undercut those same traditions in pursuit of power.
Since that same 1962, leftist forces have assumed control of the âDemocraticâ party. First, they killed Kennedy⌠not the ordinary Democrats like Johnson and others, but the rabid defenders of the C.I.A. and other elements of the growing, deep, administrative state â the true leftists. One by one, people who overtly dislike everything about religious freedom â Judaism and Christianity, specifically â managed to obtain election to the House and Senate. First through opposition to fighting Communism in Viet-Nam and marshaling students to widespread demonstrations against the government, and then, cherry on top, unseating President Richard Nixon. A new landscape emerged in American politics and power; trust in government was gone. Rebellions of the â60âs shifted morality to the dark side as federalized welfare began to erode family strengths and the raising of children to be new, moral, responsible adults. As the old order, the fundament of governance, liberty and improved standards of living, imperfect but wildly successful, was dumped, the new order of Roe v. Wade was imposed on the flimsy premise that the âpenumbra of the Constitutionâ protects a brand of âprivacyâ that permits personal convenience to be worth more than human life.
Since the explosion of drug addiction as new streams of tar heroin entered the U. S. market from Southeast Asia (thank-you, C.I.A. and the Golden Triangle), the âWar on Drugsâ has managed to capture tons of drugs and dollars, but the total flow of both has increased for decades. Drugs provide a foul but profitable â and corrupting – business in cities large and small, and a slow-motion suicide process for thousands of addicts. Weâve never had the upper hand on drugs. As we have helped to feed the growth of Mexican Cartels (and their Chinese providers) there has grown a deep division in American politics: Democrats have favored illegal entrants and âsanctuaryâ status for cities and states, where police cannot cooperate with federal deportation enforcement. Republicans have been opposed to both, and yet thwarted in every attempt to sanction so-called, law-nullifying, âsanctuaryâ declarations.
Today, drugs, mainly fentanyl, kill 100,000 mostly younger Americans EVERY DAMN YEAR! If we were facing groups of people who were SHOOTING and killing 100,000 Americans every year, this American hopes that we would marshal our forces and destroy them, saving the lives of our sons and daughters. Yet, for some reason, we have neither the wit nor will to stop drugs. Apparently there is a ârightâ to suicide by addiction. Did I mention profitable corruption? Who opposes rampant addiction? Well, it seems to be a right-wing thing which is condemned by the left (Democrats) since so many people wind up incarcerated for drug dealing. Boo-hoo. There must be a racist component since there is a preponderance of black and brown people breaking laws involving drugs. So, less than nothing is done. Indeed, in Democrat cities there are varieties of programs that FACILITATE drug use on the basis of⌠hold on to your brains⌠SAFETY!
A hundred-thousand lives are not enough. The same forces apologizing for drug users are rabidly in favor of abortion up to the moment of birth AND EVEN BEYOND THAT MOMENT. Indeed, they base their election efforts on appealing to women who agree with having the RIGHT to destroy gestating beings. First they must remain convinced that the growth in their bellies is not a human being.
Finally, the same leftists in the U. S. tend strongly toward both globalism (communism) and wars of maintenance (leftists in both parties) where, in effect, our greatest export are young men and women who risk death or disability for circumstances that have no plan for victory. And, still, there are too many Americans.
Democrats have an affinity for globalist fantasy, like âClimate Change,â as the reason to change U. S. policy to the detriment of our economy and, now, our food supply. Theyâve gone so far as to advise numbskulls to consider the climate before having children⌠not before having sex. After all, if something goes âwrong,â we can always kill the product. Instead of promoting a clean, non-polluting economy, they prefer the more fascist approach of restriction, mandation and coercion through economic leverage, like encouraging banks and others to not do business with anyone who threatens the climate, as they see it, or, God forbid, exercises Constitutional rights. This includes changing the technologies of washing machines, stoves, toilets and schoolbuses, and not for the better. After all, a lot of those manufacturers are white people, and of Euro-centric backgrounds who donât deserve any consideration for climate and a hundred other reasons, especially if Christian to boot.
Covid-19 showed that the W.H.O., China and the U. N. can fool all the people some of the time, but they were able to kill off only a few million humans with the original bug and then the mRNA shots. Theyâll have to do something more, ummm⌠effective, yes, effective, to get the world population down to their âidealâ of a billion or fewer. That many people could eat beef all they want without damaging the Earth. Still, it will take a lot of dying to achieve the âsafetyâ of our planet in a single lifetime.
